The Miserable End of Darwinian Evolution
“There can be no going
downhill - species can’t get worse as a prelude to getting better.” – Page 91, Climbing
Mount Improbable, by Richard Dawkins
…descriptions
of the world (Darwinism in particular) are heavily influenced by (atheist) scientism.
… philosopher
Thomas Nagel identifies one reason for this as “the fear of religion itself.”…
“It’s that I hope there is no God. I
don’t want there to be a God….” - Uncommon Dissent - Intellectuals Who Find Darwinism Unconvincing, William A Dembski, Editor (page 145)
We shall now
“gasp with admiration at the perfection” of the apparent design of Darwinian
“selection” today.
,%20INDIA.jpg)
“Whoever said life is fair? Where is that written?" - Grampa from The Princess Bride
“We are
machines for propagating DNA, and the propagation of DNA is a self-sustaining
process. It is every living object’s
sole reason for living.” – Richard Dawkins, evolutionary biologist and atheist
Then Dawkins and his atheist accomplices have lost the evolutionary imperative, and for them, what else is there, really?
"Atheists Richard Dawkins, Sam Harris, Daniel Dennett, Christopher Hitchens, Neil DeGrasse Tyson, Stephen Hawking, Michael Schermer, Lawrence Krauss, and Bill Nye the Science Guy combined have produced fewer children than Osama bin Laden, who had 23 *." - Dr. David Brown
Osama was the 17th of 52 children his father had, by the way.
* https://www.cnn.com/2013/08/30/world/osama-bin-laden-fast-facts/index.html
While
religiously unaffiliated people currently make up 16% of the global population,
only an estimated 10% of the world’s newborns between 2010 and 2015 were born
to religiously unaffiliated mothers..
By 2055 to
2060, just 9% of all babies will be born to religiously unaffiliated women,
while more than seven-in-ten will be born to either Muslims (36%) or Christians
(35%). – PewResearch.org/religion/2017/04/05
We could
call this “The Tragedy of the Brights,” as they like to call themselves in
smug pretense of intellectual and moral superiority.
The least
educated of the world are the most Darwinian:
This is in
stark contrast to some of the racist and anti-prophetic words of Charles Darwin,
whose first book was titled, On
the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of
Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life.
“At some
future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilized races
of man will almost certainly exterminate and replace the savage races
throughout the world.” – Charles Darwin, The Descent of Man, Chapter 3
Not exactly. In fact, the exact opposite is taking place. As a result, the world IQ is declining.
The most fertile countries in the world are all populated by what Darwin referred to as “savages” or “dark races”.
1.
Niger: 7.27 children per woman.
2.
Angola: 6.57 children per woman.
3.
Democratic Republic of
the Congo: 6.54 children per
woman.
4.
Mali: 6.49 children per woman.
5.
Benin: 6.48 children per woman.
6.
Chad: 6.47 children per woman.
7.
Uganda: 6.45 children per woman.
8.
Somalia: 6.43 children per woman.
9.
South Sudan: 6.42 children per woman.
- Burundi: 6.41 children per woman1. (Statista.com)
15 Countries Where City-Dwellers Are Most Likely To Live In Slums
| Rank | Country | % of Urban Population Living In Slums |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | South Sudan | 96% |
| 2 | Central African Republic | 93% |
| 3 | Sudan | 92% |
| 4 | Chad | 88% |
| 5 | Sao Tome and Principe | 87% |
| 6 | Guinea-Bissau | 82% |
| 7 | Mozambique | 80% |
| 8 | Mauritania | 80% |
| 9 | Madagascar | 77% |
| 10 | Sierra Leone | 76% |
| 11 | DR Congo | 75% |
| 12 | Haiti | 74% |
| 13 | Ethiopia | 74% |
| 14 | Somalia | 74% |
| 15 | Niger | 70% |
The
least educated are also the least developed:
And they are the poorest:
In conclusion, Darwinism and its atheist advocates in particular, such as Richard Dawkins, who married three times and had only one child, are evolutionary failures. By the way, if Richard Dawkins considers himself so very "bright," then why did he marry and divorce twice, utterly failing in one of the most important decisions of his bitter, hate-filled life?
"Faith is one of the world's great evils..." - Richard Dawkins
"Anybody who has been seriously engaged in scientific work of any kind realizes that over the entrance to the gates of the temple of science are written the words: 'Ye must have faith.' " - Physicist Max Planck, Nobel Laureate
“A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die…..” – Max Planck
Never was this truer than in the subject of Darwinism.
The Insuperable Statistics of Naturalistic Polypeptide Synthesis *
Titin is the largest protein in the human body. It consists of 38,138 amino acid residues in a precise sequence. The first naturalistic synthesis, whether stepwise or in one single, continuous process, consisted of “selecting” 1 out of 20 amino acids which make up humans, 38,138 times in succession, or 1/20 to the 38,138th power. This is equal to 1 in 10 to the 49,618th power. The pretense of claiming that “sections” of any protein were “assembled” overlooks the unassailable fact that any “section,” however small, had to be assembled under the same statistical constraints. Whether one does the computations in one step or 1,000 steps, the figures are beyond dispute. They get a great deal worse, in fact.
Only Levorotary (left-handed) amino acids were used, not Dextrorotary (right-handed) amino acids, so 1 in 10 to the 49,618th power has to be multiplied by 1/2 to the 38,138th power or 1 in 10 to the 11,480th power. One more time for all consecutive peptide bonds, which are equally probable as the random formation of non-peptide bonds, thus another factor of 1/2 to the 38,138th power. The product of these three essential elements of original Titin synthesis is 1 chance in 10 to the 72,578th power (not counting whatever calculation is appropriate for the precise folding of the chain).
Finally, “selection,” that magic word Darwin so popularized, demands that at each successive step, there must be some advantage conferred, otherwise the random mutation cannot prevail and multiply. No one has ever proposed any original synthesis with breakdowns of thousands of intermediaries and each of their “selective” advantages.
Titin is only one of more than 20,000 polypeptides (proteins and enzymes) in the human body.
Pseudoscientific sophisticates claim that large proteins were “assembled” from smaller component blocks. Sorry, that does not obviate the requisite statistics, it attempts to wave them away. Every smaller component still was the result of arbitrary picking of the correct amino acid out of 20 different possibilities, in L form, with a peptide bond, and precise folding.
In 1943, the distinguished French mathematician Émile Borel stated that “events with a sufficiently small probability never occur” (Institute of Mathematical Statistics).
Dr. Borel chose a fairly safe number, 10 to the minus 50. ( 1 https://owlcation.com/stem/Borels-Law-of-Probability)
When identical spheres are stacked, they drop into the valley of three other spheres, which reduces their equivalent cubic volume to 74% of their diameter.
Therefore the volume of 105 marbles one cm in diameter, cubed equals
(.74 x 105) cubed = 4.05 x 1014 cubic kilometers.
In 1943, the distinguished French mathematician Émile Borel stated that “events with a sufficiently small probability never occur” (Institute of Mathematical Statistics). Dr. Borel chose a fairly safe number, 1 chance in 10 to the 50th power, or 10-50 . *
Let’s look at the volume of 1050 marbles, one centimeter in diameter.
There are 100 such marbles per meter, and 100 times 1,000 per kilometer = 105 marbles per km .
Whereas 105 marbles are in 1 kilometer, when identical spheres are stacked in large numbers, they drop into the valley of three other spheres, which reduces their equivalent cubic volume to 74% of their diameter.
Therefore, the volume of 105 marbles cubed equals (.74 km) cubed = .405 cubic kilometer per 1015 marbles
1050 marbles have 1035 times the volume of 1015 marbles = .405 x 1035 cubic kilometers.
The volume of earth is 108.3 x 1010cubic kilometers. **
4.05 x 1034 cubic km divided by 1.083 x 1010 cubic kilometers/earth = 3.74 x 1024 volumes the size of earth.
Therefore 1050 marbles would fill 3,740,000 billion billion earth-size spheres full to search and find the unique marble on your first and only try. Personally, I would call it impossible to find that unique marble in just one earth-sized sphere full of them.
* https://owlcation.com/stem/Borels-Law-of-Probability
** https://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary/factsheet/earthfact.html
Could you find the one unique marble in this mix on your first and only try? (1 in 10 to the minus 50, not an infinite number of tries, not even 10,000 tries, just 1, that is Borel's definition)
Until man duplicates a blade of grass, nature can laugh at his so-called scientific knowledge. – Thomas Edison
“In China we can criticize Darwin, but not the government; in America, you can criticize the government, but not Darwin!” ― Jun-yuan Chen, paleontologist
Censoring and silencing dissent from Darwinism is unintelligent and unscientific.
“I believe that I was considered by all my masters and by my Father as a very ordinary boy, rather below the common standard in intellect.” – Charles Darwin
If Charles considered his father “the best judge of character whom I ever knew,” how heavily and prophetically those words must have fallen upon him: “You will be a disgrace to yourself and all your family.”
Darwin’s disgrace was leading countless followers to atheism, for the Creator was no longer “needed”. Darwinian evilution (correctly spelled for the first time) has led more humans around the world to atheism than any other argument or claim.
* http://TheEvolutionFraud.wordpress.com
Science Books Challenging Darwinism
Intelligent
Design – The Bridge Between Science and Theology, William A. Dembski
Signature
in the Cell- DNA and the Evidence for Intelligent Design, by Stephen C. Meyer
The
Design Inference: Eliminating Chance Through Small Probabilities, by William A. Dembski
Understanding Intelligent Design: Everything You
Need to Know in Plain Language, by Dembski et al
Darwin Devolves: The New Science About DNA That Challenges
Evolution, by Michael J. Behe
Intelligent
Design: Message From the Designers, by Rael
Darwin’s
Doubt: The Explosive Origin of Animal
Life and the Case for Intelligent Design, by Stephen C. Meyer
Understanding
Intelligent Design: Everything You Need to Know in Plain Language, by William A. Dembski
Undeniable, by
Douglas Axe
Brilliant Creations – The
Wonder of Nature and Life, by John Phillip Jaeger
OF DARWINISM….
“For over 20 years I thought I was working on evolution….But there was not one thing I knew about it… So for the last few weeks I’ve tried putting a simple question to various people, the question is, “Can you tell me any one thing that is true?” I tried that question on the Geology staff at the Field Museum of Natural History and the only answer I got was silence. I tried it on the members of the Evolutionary Morphology Seminar in the University of Chicago, A very prestigious body of Evolutionists, and all I got there was silence for a long time and eventually one person said, “Yes, I do know one thing, it ought not to be taught in High School”….over the past few years….you have experienced a shift from Evolution as knowledge to evolution as faith…Evolution not only conveys no knowledge, but seems somehow to convey anti-knowledge.” - (Dr. Collin Patterson evolutionist, address at the American Museum of Natural History, New York City, Nov. 1981)
_____________________________
Comments
Post a Comment