The Miserable End of Darwinian Evolution

 

“There can be no going downhill - species can’t get worse as a prelude to getting better.” – Page 91, Climbing Mount Improbable, by Richard Dawkins

 “It cannot be said often enough that Darwinian theory does not allow for getting temporarily worse in quest of a long-term goal.” – Ibid, Page 132

 “To say it again, going down the slopes of Mount Improbable is not allowed by Natural Selection.” – Ibid,  Page 134

 “The fact of heredity sees to it that the accidental improvements found in each generation are accumulated over many generations.  At the end of many generations of cumulative finding, a designoid object is produced which may make us gasp with admiration at the perfection of its apparent design.”  – Ibid, Page 28

…descriptions of the world (Darwinism in particular) are heavily influenced by (atheist) scientism.

… philosopher Thomas Nagel identifies one reason for this as “the fear of religion itself.”… “It’s that I hope there is no God.  I don’t want there to be a God….” - Uncommon Dissent - Intellectuals Who Find Darwinism Unconvincing, William A Dembski,  Editor (page 145)

We shall now “gasp with admiration at the perfection” of the apparent design of Darwinian “selection” today.

Slums are the fastest growing, i.e. most 

Darwinian, human habit on earth today.  Worldwide, over one billion humans live in them, 24% of all humanity.

 “Going down the slopes of Mount Improbable is not allowed by natural selection.”  The billion plus humans living in slums are not going up any slopes other than trash.

 ________________________

“We are machines for propagating DNA, and the propagation of DNA is a self-sustaining process.  It is every living object’s sole reason for living.” – Richard Dawkins, evolutionary biologist and atheist

Then Dawkins and his atheist accomplices have lost the evolutionary imperative, and for them, what else is there, really?

Atheists Richard Dawkins, Sam Harris, Daniel Dennett, Christopher Hitchens, Neil DeGrasse Tyson, Stephen Hawking, Michael Schermer, Lawrence Krauss, and Bill Nye the Science Guy combined have  produced fewer children than Osama bin Laden, the 17^th of 52 children, his father had, by the way.

While religiously unaffiliated people currently make up 16% of the global population, only an estimated 10% of the world’s newborns between 2010 and 2015 were born to religiously unaffiliated mothers..

By 2055 to 2060, just 9% of all babies will be born to religiously unaffiliated women, while more than seven-in-ten will be born to either Muslims (36%) or Christians (35%). – PewResearch.org/religion/2017/04/05

 

We could call this “The Tragedy of the Brights,” as they like to call themselves in smug pretense of intellectual and moral superiority.

 

The least educated of the world are the most Darwinian:

 

This is in stark contrast to some of the racist and anti-prophetic words of Charles Darwin, whose first book was titled, On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life.

“At some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilized races of man will almost certainly exterminate and replace the savage races throughout the world.” – Charles Darwin, The Descent of Man, Chapter 3

The ten most fertile countries in the world are all populated by what Darwin referred to as “savages” or “dark races”.

 

1.    Niger: 7.27 children per woman.

2.    Angola: 6.57 children per woman.

3.    Democratic Republic of the Congo: 6.54 children per woman.

4.    Mali: 6.49 children per woman.

5.    Benin: 6.48 children per woman.

6.    Chad: 6.47 children per woman.

7.    Uganda: 6.45 children per woman.

8.    Somalia: 6.43 children per woman.

9.    South Sudan: 6.42 children per woman.

10. Burundi: 6.41 children per woman¹.         (Statista.com)

 

15 Countries Where City-Dwellers Are Most Likely To Live In Slums

Rank	Country	% of Urban Population Living In Slums
1	South Sudan	96%
2	Central African Republic	93%
3	Sudan	92%
4	Chad	88%
5	Sao Tome and Principe	87%
6	Guinea-Bissau	82%
7	Mozambique	80%
8	Mauritania	80%
9	Madagascar	77%
10	Sierra Leone	76%
11	DR Congo	75%
12	Haiti	74%
13	Ethiopia	74%
14	Somalia	74%
15	Niger	70%

The least educated also happen to be the least developed:

 

 

 

And the poorest:

 

    In conclusion, Darwinism and its atheist advocates in particular, such as Richard Dawkins, married three times and only one child, are evolutionary failures.

 

             

 

 

Science Books Challenging Darwinism

 

Intelligent Design – The Bridge Between Science and Theology,  William A. Dembski

Signature in the Cell- DNA and the Evidence for Intelligent Design, by Stephen C. Meyer

The Design Inference: Eliminating Chance Through Small Probabilities, by William A. Dembski

Understanding Intelligent Design: Everything You Need to Know in Plain Language, by Dembski et al

Darwin Devolves:  The New Science About DNA That Challenges Evolution, by Michael J. Behe               

Intelligent Design: Message From the Designers, by Rael

Darwin’s Doubt:  The Explosive Origin of Animal Life and the Case for Intelligent Design, by Stephen C. Meyer

Understanding Intelligent Design: Everything You Need to Know in Plain Language, by William A. Dembski

Undeniable, by  Douglas Axe

Brilliant  Creations – The Wonder of Nature and Life, by John Phillip Jaeger

 THE  END

OF DARWINISM….

_____________________________

In comparative terms, there's no poverty in America by a long shot. Heritage Foundation political scientist Robert Rector has worked up figures showing that when the official U.S. measure of poverty was developed in 1963, a poor American family had an income twenty‑nine times greater than the average per capita income in the rest of the world. An individual American could make more money than 93 percent of the other people on the planet and still be considered poor. ‑‑ P.J. O'Rourke, in Parliament of Whores